Thursday, December 17, 2009

Behind (way behind) the times

In a little bit of magazine news, Salon.com's Broadsheet points out that Time magazine's annual "Person of the Year" coverstory hasn't featured a standalone female pick since 1986(!!!). They go on to suggest options ranging from Lady GaGa to Hillary Clinton, but I'm still reeling from the whole "1986" thing.

[Note: For serious, Time: you picked Ted Turner and Jeff Bezos. Why not J.K. Rowling?]

Labels: ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Marie Cloutier said...

That's sort of worse than the Publisher's Weekly flap. Appalling. But then TIME is rather conservative so I'm almost not surprised.

2:35 PM

 
Blogger Gort79 said...

I know... but it's still totally depressing. Particularly on a year with SO MANY excellent female canidates!

10:38 AM

 
Blogger Yulianka said...

I actually even would have been okay with them picking Stephenie Meyer--I'm obviously not a fan of her work, but there's no denying that she's been tremendously influential.

5:58 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home




Have a piece of book-related news? Send it our way!
Links

wordcandy.net

wordcandy.net Bookcrossing bookshelf

Girl Detective

Mysterious Mysteries

A Study in Sherlock

OldCookbooks.com

sfsignal

MangaBlog

Austen Blog


Previous Posts

Overplayed

The gift that keeps on giving

My wallet is crying already.

Greeks gone wild

Percy Jackson's High School Musical

Well played, Mr. (and Mrs.) King.

Double ugh.

Literary gifts for our fellow procrastinators...

Holiday cheer on tap

"Best of" goes graphic


Archives



Powered by Blogger