data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fa2b/5fa2b22b6185a478f8e71a9d71889e3203a704f5" alt=""
As the post's author points out, Jackson's lower-budget projects have actually been far more profitable than his higher-budget films, so I wonder who authorized these seemingly unlimited funds. Has the global recession skipped New Zealand?
Labels: Movie Adaptations, Tolkien
2 Comments:
Two-part film adaptation? Of The Hobbit? The book that is shorter than any of the three in The Lord of The Rings trilogy? I didn't care much for the junk added to The Two Towers and The Return of The King was at least forty minutes too long. Do I want to see this?
7:02 PM
This feels to me like splitting the last Harry Potter book into two films: you could argue that the text would support two movies, but that's true of several of the earlier HP books, too. I think they just want twice the ticket money... and if they're talking 3D ticket prices, that's gonna be a lot of cash.
4:35 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home